Since Ethan Marcotte coined the term “Responsive Web Design” it is being vastly used by the people who are somehow work in conjunction with the field of web designing and cherish immense interest to learn about this niche. Though, it’s hard to identify the difference between adaptive and responsive web design without being an expert in this genre but still two of these aspects must be taken into consideration when website redesigning is in your mind.

Before hiring a web designing expert it’s important to know the basic differences to choose the right one that may serve your means to a full extent. They both change appearance, in accordance with the browser environment, on which they are being accessed. But web designing is incomplete if we don’t follow the website development checklist to maintain our website quality.

Difference between Responsive and Adaptive Web Design

• Responsive web design can act in response to the browser size at any given point, regardless the width the site can tune finely. Whereas adaptive web design can adapt to the size of the browser at a definite point. With the utilization of CSS3 module, one can develop a flexible grid where images can shrink, text can wrap to adjust with the browser.
• Using responsive web design the website is crafted to offer an optimum viewing experience besides easy navigation and easy reading with minimal panning, scrolling and resizing. When you hire a truly competent professional for web design in Durham you can eventually get hold of more information.
• On the other hand, adaptive designs make use of a series of static layouts depending on the breakpoints, dissimilar to the response web design, adaptive don’t responds when they are loaded. In a nutshell, like RWD, adaptive web design doesn’t have any single layout that alters spontaneously in accordance with the screen size. In place of that, various, divergent layouts for multiple screen sizes and the layout are employed according to the screen size.
• Responsive design tends to offer the users an optimal user experience irrespective of the device they access the site. It enables one HTML file to access in more than one environment. Conversely, adaptive web designs seem to be a better option for those who firstly work with a smaller budget secondly work for a small group where the users use more or less same sort of device.

Lastly the RWD takes more code as well as implementation strategies along with fluid grids, flexible foundations, and CSS. Whereas, AWD tends to have a streamlined, layered approach that uses scripting to support adapting to more than a few devices as well as screen sizes thus adaptive is considered to be less flexible. Moreover, RWD loads faster in comparison to the adaptive web design. Loading all of that extra layout may take resources and time thus adaptive sites naturally be slower than their RWD counterpart.